Forget retirement Parky? (Oh and Levenson please, please, please extend controls to ALL media on Thursday!)
I don’t know, about you but for one am I’m frankly PISSED OFF with the incessant celebrity plugs, for books, DVDs and films that seem to dominate all our radio and TV interviews, and its NOT just because Christmas is looming.
Whether its Peter Andre schmoozing with the Loose Women team to sell his latest tour, his fatherhood qualities, his six pack or his 4th autobiography. (Boy, how well has he done since appearing on I’m a Celebrity Get Me Out Of Here with his future wife, then divorcee, Katie Price?)
Or the latest Gino cookbook or Davina fitness video or the Jeremy Vine memoirs or Keith Lemon’s latest TV show etc…
Is it just really efficient celebrity publicists, their free PR or something else, much more cynical or OUR FAULT as viewers?
Every year, the Daily Mirror Pride Of Britain Awards celebrates the exceptional achievements of ‘normal’ heroes with the obligatory and very tearful ‘celebrities’. Other than that, our media would just be full of shallow interviews with average pop stars, soap stars, ‘Made in Chelsea’ or ‘TOWIE’ types?
Some remarkable individuals, who are often patronised by ‘normal folk’, (just at the time the camera pans to someone like, Emma Bunton), as she wipes her genuine, but lucrative ‘TV station audience/advertising’ tears.
These remarkable individuals save lives, are selfless, are unsung, brave, caring, often change worldwide attitudes, make a difference, passionate and raise awareness, so tell me why it is just once a year they get to have their ‘moment to shine’ or even be interviwed, albeit for briefly?
Just see for yourself. Why not watch or listen to; This Morning, Loose Women, Chatty Man or the One Show, Jeremy Vine, etc…
Is it really damn good publicists or the TV and radio editors, looking to max out on viewer figures or advertising?
I mean Iceland must be making a killing with the latest ‘I’m a celebrity’ viewing figures?
Do we really get much insight from the celebrity interview, apart from the product plug, latest fad, or how to achieve youthful looks at 90!? For goodness sake, does the often celebrity educate, inform, make a difference, raise awareness, offer hope or actually really entertain us? The celebrity appearsto have to fulfil the interview for contractual reasons?
I’m an 80’s kid who grew up on Parky, Wogan and Russell Harty. We have really ‘dumbed down’ in my opinion. I love documentaries, period dramas, new dramas and insightful interviews, like those from Piers Morgan Life Stories. (I mean Wossy spends most of his show talking about himself and asking very weak questions of his guests.)
So does the appearance of the celebrity guarantee a certain level of viewing figure for the TV show? (Which in turn guarantees the life of the TV station or a certain level of advertising revenue or listener/viewers?)
I know the scope of the Levenson Inquiry doesnt extend to this, but I’m not happy.
What about the real life inspiring stories, the developments, the progress of non celebrities and perhaps educating the UK and world, on Burma, The Killing Fields, The Congo, The Sudanese, Famine, etc or a matter close to my heart the soon to be 2nd biggest illness in the world, STROKES?
Did you know?
(Source: www.worldstrokecampaign.org/2012)
- Stroke can be prevented.
- Stroke can be treated.
- Stroke can be managed in the long-term.
- 1 in 6 people will have a stroke in their lifetime.
- Every 6 seconds stroke kills someone.
- Every other second stroke attacks a person, regardless of age or gender.
- 15 million people experience a stroke each year, 6 million of them do not survive.
- About 30 million people have had a stroke – most have residual disabilities
(Source: The Stroke Association UK)
- 150,000 suffer stroke per year.
- 53,000 people die from the disease.
- Over 1,000,000 people in the UK are living with the effects of stroke.
- Finally, the £20 billion NHS cuts have hit short, medium and long term stroke care and rehabilitation MASSIVELY, so we need to fight for you!
(Source: Fighting Strokes Facebook & Twitter)
- Early intensive therapy & no FINAL PROGNOSIS should be given by medics to the loved ones (and or patient) until atleast 1 year by medics, (ideally 2 years) & CERTAINLY NOT 2 weeks after the patients’ stroke.
- Bite sized and ultimate goals are essential.
- The often used word ‘PLATEAU’ doesnt exist, it’s just a medical term to conveniently explain that the money runs out to help the patient progress further after their stroke or brain injury.
- There is a ‘Hidden Emotional Side of Stroke and Brain Injury.
- Marraiges are often destroyed by brain injury and stroke.
- Sleep issues with stroke and brain injury are very COMMON.
- Medium & long term rehabilitation should be more available for everyone who wants to put the effort required into improving, and be far more concentrated, and for far longer in the community. NO PAIN NO GAIN!
- There are no published STATS on locked in syndrome, range and levels of progress, incidences of brainstem stroke, case studies etc..
Why is it that Fighting Strokes, and charities like mine, generally get one chance (if they are lucky) at plugging their vital issues and causes? Yet ‘D list’ celebrities have an open door, to appear as often as they like on the sofa, just to do a plug with a bit of light chat?
When will all media convey the important messages of the day, rather than appearing to be a free PR tool for celebrity publicists?
Ah well, social media is the way forward. Speak direct (an unedited) and share, with your audience.
Sorry, if I sound like a grumpy old woman, rant over, its just whats in my head!!!
Maybe, you think I’m wrong??